Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can ; 44(9): 1006-1010, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1819550

ABSTRACT

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, our centre made adjustments that reduced the number of patient visits, ultrasound scans, laboratory investigations, and face-to face instructions. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether these changes had any effect on the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing infertility treatment. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rates from intrauterine insemination and frozen embryo transfer. Clinical pregnancy rates were not statistically different between patients who underwent either procedure before and after the protocols were put in place. It is reassuring to know our pandemic protocol adjustments did not have a negative impact on infertility treatment outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infertility , Embryo Transfer/methods , Female , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Humans , Infertility/therapy , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Treatment Outcome
2.
Community Ment Health J ; 57(7): 1267-1277, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317582

ABSTRACT

In late 2019, the first case of COVID-19 was reported in Wuhan, China. Soon after, cases began to spread globally. This study aimed to examine the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the adult population in the United States. We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an anonymous online survey methodology distributed to participants across 13 states. The data collected included demographical information and outcomes from validated mental health screeners (GAD-7, PHQ-9, and IES-R) to assess levels of anxiety, depression, and stress. A total of 1356 participants completed the survey. GAD-7, PHQ-9, and IES-R levels differed significantly (p < 0.05) according to age, gender, and educational level. There was also significant difference between GAD-7 level as well as IES-R level between healthcare and non-healthcare workers (p = 0.02 and p = 0.028). Overall, this study has helped to garner a better understanding of COVID-19's impact on mental health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , Anxiety , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Health Personnel , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL